Not for all the little plastic toys in China
American Gods by: Neil Gaiman is another excellent book I read while jostling through roundabouts in Spain. Mr. Gaiman is the reigning champion of mythology and plot development.
One sentence premise: the old gods and the new gods are battling for existence and tensions are rising.
The story follows the main character, Shadow, who gets caught in the midst of that one sentence premise. It’s a new take on old mythology (I imagine that’s what everyone says). And I guarantee you will learn something if not many things throughout the course of this story (like how Easter is named for the pagan goddess Oestre, and there actually was a ritual that involved looking for hidden eggs). It’s a bit long, but it really doesn’t feel that way. The story moves smoothly from beginning to end; although, there is a definite pace change from how the book builds at the beginning and takes off towards the close. The ending itself is somewhat laid back–a comfortable wrap-up.
I recommend it if you like mythology (more towards Norse, Celtic, Egyptian) in fiction. This actually would be a good read for fantasy fans too if you find your typical reading growing stale (or you just want to read a good book). Those are sort of the niche crowds this would appeal to, but overall it’s a good read for anyone (over the age of 16, or thereabouts). It is an adult book, but it isn’t outrightly gratuitous (although I suppose some people would disagree–there’s more than 1 sex scene [tigers and bears, Oh MY!]).
The reason I like the book is because it has some pretty big themes, such as the information age versus the old world, death, and a variety of new takes on love and devotion (some of them creepy). We read a good deal about these ideas, but aside from death, rarely are they more than footnotes or provided in such an interesting way (yes, love is commonplace too, but the way it comes through in this work is not). It also offers something entirely new in regards to looking at the American dream and the American spirit. Plus, Neil Gaiman doesn’t pull punches when he writes, and his narrative style is simply masterful. The man can tell a good story. It’s an $8 book. Snag it off of Amazon.
Telepathy, of course.
This is how Stephen King begins to describe what writing is in his book On Writing. It’s sort of funny, pointing out how me now reading his book in 2007 is in some ways him sending a message across space and time from 2000.
Short and Simple:
I liked this book a lot. I read it in a day while in Valencia, Spain (actually from one evening there and then the car trip to Lleida). So, it’s a quick read, and I think a lot can be gleaned about writing technique from the mind of Mr. King. If you don’t want to listen to him because he’s considered a popular author and not a literary author, well you may as well turn in your “I’m a writer” jacket and matching ball cap right now.
Long and Savory:
A quick breakdown of the book has a brief autobiography at the beginning, a section called toolbox that makes up the writing advisory section of the book, and then a closing bit about living. It would take forever to go over all this book covers, so I’m just going to throw down some of the stuff I liked.
1) If you mean shit, say shit. It isn’t hard to imagine that Stephen King gets a lot of complaints about his books, but blaming him for what a fictional character does is… well, dumb. Even people who look down on profanity cuss when they get a door ding in the parking lot. And some people will have outlooks that we do not agree with. That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be written.
2) Read and write a lot. Not that this isn’t something that all writers don’t already know, but I thought I’d throw in his statistics and advice on the matter. He reads 70-80 novels a year and recommends writing 1000 words a day, for a start. He writes 2000 words every morning, which is easy for him because it’s his job. If you take the time to go through the autobiographical portion of the novel though, it is clear he has written under much more adverse conditions (while working multiple jobs, while being married with 2 very young kids–most situations that are equivalent if not better excuses than the average person could muster, and he doesn’t make them). You have to have dedication. He recommends four to six hours a day (which shouldn’t seem strenuous if you actually enjoy it).
3) There are 3 parts to telling a story: narration, description, dialogue. Narration moves the story from A to B; description creates the sensory world for the reader; dialogue makes the characters come to life and develops them. Mr. King describes plot as the jackhammer of writing, as in if you’re extracting a fossil, you’ll chisel most of it to pieces and extract only a very mashed up final version. He argues that plot happens, but it can’t be too readily planned for or the work will seem forced. This is a really interesting portion of the book to read through because I think it presents a different concept of the process that could really be useful to a lot of writers.
4) On symbolism and theme… They aren’t something you should write towards in the first draft but something that should be brought out in a second draft. If they’re there, develop them; if they aren’t, don’t. When you recognize recurring patterns in your writing, take them and bring them to bear.
5) When rewriting, be more of a cutter than an adder. A rewrite should take out maybe 10% of the book while reworking it into a cohesive whole. It’s tricky because you could be adding scenes to make things work, but eliminating the unnecessary stuff is essential to writing a good book. Stephen King talks about first writing with the door closed and showing no one, and then, have readers look over it, take some time off (maybe a month or more), and when writing a second draft do it with the door open and the world can see (even close friends are ok as an early audience). The first time you tell a story, you’re telling it to yourself and figuring out how everything works, but the second time you’re telling it to everyone else and also need to hide some of those extra cogs.
Anyway, there’s my quick rundown on the book. There’s so much more and so much more about what I glossed over here. My reviews for books in the future probably won’t be this long, but since this book is about writing, I thought it would be good to throw down a little bit more. The book’s $8. Pick it up on Amazon.
New Section–Reading
So all writers read. Ok, well all good writers read. The writers who say they don’t have time to read are either joking or kidding themselves. I have been known to make such jokes in the past… frequently. Anyway, I’ve kicked my reading habit back into full tilt and hopefully it’ll stay that way. I’ve added a reading section where I’ll post quick bits about the books I’ve read. I intend to start with books I’ve just read without going back and listing off what I’ve read in the past. In fact, I may do some rereading just so I can write good reviews in good conscience. This section is somewhat also for me to see how much I am reading. Stephen King (and I’m starting this section with a book of his) says he reads 70-80 novels a year. I think that’s a lot (he doesn’t seem to), but I will try to aspire to it. Personal comments about any books I put up snippets about would be greatly appreciated and just cool in general.
Now if you tune your dials to poem…
So, I posted a sort of metafictive document earlier that was a sum up of revision intentions for my Wayfarer novel, and I wanted to do something for poetry too. This is some prewriting. Prewriting is obviously what you do before writing. In this case, I was trying to work with different vernaculars to try and develop a sense for the poems I was working on. Since my last behind-the-scenes piece was on my novel, this one is taken from a small bit of the early start-up writing I did for my Just the Girl poem series.
Revision Plans for the Novel
So, the first draft of my novel for class was finished over a month ago now. I had to do a short write-up about what my intentions for revision were and what book I chose to read to help me write. To be honest, there are parts of the novel that I am pained to read over, and I’m ok with blaming that on the deadline. And, as a collective whole, the novel feels unfinished. Here is a short, yet still very in-depth, look at what I will do, if I choose to go into the full-fledged revision process.
Always fighting!
(To get the best effect of this poem, read it before reading this explanation at the top.)
This was a quick exercise in poetry, where I was trying to show an internalized mindset. A friend of mine showed me a sort of shorthand for writing out attack combinations, and I’ve tried to expand on it. Often, during a less interesting part of a class or on a long car ride, I will just start scribbling out attack patterns (usually common boxing or Muay Thai combinations). Just because a fighter isn’t in the ring doesn’t mean he stops thinking like a fighter or about the fights to come.
“The Mindset”
Read the rest of this entry »
A Moment of Dialogue
Here’s just a small snippet of dialogue I was working on. Nothing really, but I thought I should post something new.
It was the best kind of 5 a.m. We had brewed too much coffee but it seemed to be just the right amount.
I swiveled my head like a periscope. “Do you ever feel like beneath should end in an E?” I asked, looking to my roommate Erik, who was wedging a small stack of papers into a paperclip.
His whole head twitched like the leg of a smashed bug out from under a shoe. “What?”
“Like breath and breathe. Sometimes I think beneath needs an E on the end because it feels longer. Like sleeping is beneath me should be sleeping is beneathe me.”
“Sounds the same.”
“But it feels different.”